RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback

Thomas Lord wrote:
>The rationale for "EOT Lite" appears to remain nothing
>more or less than *breaking* interop by gratuitously
>proliferating font formats.  Shame on that proposal.

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying; can you try again, focusing on the details other than the gratuitiveness?

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 22:49:47 UTC