- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:23:29 -0400
- To: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>
- Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Laurence Penney<lorp@lorp.org> wrote: > Could you elaborate on the problems IE has with bold and italic styles? My understanding is that, effectively, if a @font-face is being used, font-style/font-weight/etc. are simply ignored by IE. More specifically, there's no way to tell it which fonts to substitute for bold/italic/etc., so it can't respect those directives. You could still get bold/italics, it's just a minor pain. You'd have to change the font-family along with every font-style/font-weight change, like body { font-family: myfont; } b { font-weight: bold; font-family: myfont-bold; } Moreover, it makes almost no difference at all for header fonts, since you're unlikely to have some parts of the header italicized or bolded but not other parts. Header fonts are the biggest use-case for @font-face anyway, as far as I understand, so I don't think this deficiency of IE is a deal-breaker at all. If you do want to use a custom font and have bold and italics work right, it's somewhat hackish but should still work okay in most cases. I haven't tested this, though, and could be way off the mark.
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 17:24:09 UTC