- From: Ben Weiner <ben@readingtype.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:58:11 +0100
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Hi, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > It would improve the format, IMHO, to give it a name that doesn't > include "EOT". Indeed; that will help the historians if no-one else. > > I offer "Web Open Type". Let the bikeshedding begin! I prefer names that get away from 'embed' because you do not embed a font in a web page in the same way that you embed it in a PDF. I think Web Type Format, WTF, has probably already been suggested ;-) Ben -- Ben Weiner | http://readingtype.org.uk/about/contact.html
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 22:58:54 UTC