- From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:43:11 +0100
- To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
2009/8/3 Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>: > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:41 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote: >> I assert that if the W3C promotes the distribution of files with root >> strings, it will compromise its credibility. > > Thank you. I was looking for a way to express > that concisely. > > An EOTL Recommendation that does not encourage > EOTC support with rootstrings ignored effectively > endorses the use of rootstrings as a UA-enforced > form of DRM. Right - when we say "EOTC files with rootstrings should be ignored" we mean that the FILE should be ignored - flushed, as John Hudson poetically calls it - and not merely the rootstring.
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 18:44:10 UTC