Re: A way forward

John Daggett wrote:

> This issue of a new font format is *entirely* a licensing issue. 

Insofar as a format defines a structure that can be licensed for 
particular purposes and does so in a way that enables the license to 
relate in some meaningful way to the real-world, this is true. My point 
was that the structural limitation that you point to is a real-world 
situation that can still be meaningfully addressed at the licensing 
level, even though this is not ideal.

> Creating two font
> files, a legacy EOT and a new format .webfont/ZOT, is a pain but
> it does not have this limitation.


John Hudson

Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 23:16:43 UTC