- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:39:00 +0000
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of John Daggett > Hopefully this message reaches Sylvain on a chamomile tea day > rather than a triple venti day. Hey now :) "For relaxing times, make it Suntory time..." I agree with you. Our @font-face implementation must be fixed and Windows must do a better job support CFF fonts. No argument. > I would care less about supporting EOT-Lite if > Microsoft was committing to supporting @font-face and CFF fonts better. Well, if it would make you care less, that's not going to make us touch it ! Allow me to be my slow self and replay this: you'd be much more comfortable supporting EOTL if we publicly committed to addressing both issues, and to do so by the time IE9 ships at the latest, with, I think an emphasis on addressing CFF issues earlier. Am I getting this right ?
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:49:09 UTC