www-font@w3.org from July to September 2009 by author

ACJ

• OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!] (Friday, 3 July)

Anton Prowse

• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Ben Weiner

• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Another web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 30 July)
• Another web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Monday, 13 July)
• Web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 9 July)
• CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*" headers in Apache (Was Re: .webfont Proposal) (Thursday, 9 July)

Bert Bos

• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Monday, 6 July)

Bill Davis

• EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Monday, 7 September)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 25 August)
• FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)

Chris Fynn

• Re: Format name proposals (Wednesday, 2 September)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• The unmentionable (was: "A way forward") (Wednesday, 29 July)
• same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward) (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)

Chris Wilson

• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Christine Bloomquist

• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals - Sounds good to this DINOSAUR (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Wednesday, 1 July)

Christopher Fynn

• Supporting EOT-Lite (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)

Christopher Fynn

• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Sunday, 12 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Sunday, 12 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Questions re web-fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• EOT Lite spec? (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Christopher Slye

• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: progress on mutual understanding (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Partial fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)

Dave Crossland

• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Friday, 7 August)
• Fwd: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Fwd: Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly) (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2.1 (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• "Web fonts — where are we?" (Monday, 20 July)
• TypeCon liveblogging (Sunday, 19 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: a basic question (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: hope for a way forward (Friday, 3 July)

Dirk Pranke

• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 9 July)

Divya Manian

• Re: Supporting EOT-Lite (Monday, 3 August)

Erik van Blokland

• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward) (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• .webfont Proposal 2.1 (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: a basic question (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Partial fonts (Monday, 6 July)

François REMY

• Re: Format name proposals (Friday, 28 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Sunday, 12 July)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: a basic question (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!] (Friday, 3 July)
• EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?! (Friday, 3 July)

Gustavo Ferreira

• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• .screenfonts (was: Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite) (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Wednesday, 29 July)
• .screenfonts (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)

Håkon Wium Lie

• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Supporting EOT-Lite (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly) (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Saturday, 18 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

info@ascenderfonts.com

• Re: A way forward (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)

Jason CranfordTeague

• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)

John Daggett

• EOT usage technique (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available) (Wednesday, 5 August)
• EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: Fonts and security (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• EOT-Lite File Format (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite) (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• EOT-Lite clarification (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: "Web fonts — where are we?" (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Sunday, 5 July)

John Hudson

• Re: updated WOFF specification (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: Format name proposals (Friday, 4 September)
• Re: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type" (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Saturday, 29 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Friday, 28 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: Next step? (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Friday, 7 August)
• Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available) (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Fonts and security (was: The unmentionable) (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: format changes as false protection (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: CFF and Uniscribe (Tuesday, 28 July)
• CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite) (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite clarification (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: A way forward (Sunday, 26 July)
• Weekend (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• A way forward (was: Webfont compression) (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2.1 (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Partial fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: a basic question (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• The other party in all this (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)

Jonathan Kew

• Re: updated WOFF specification (Wednesday, 16 September)
• Re: updated WOFF specification (Thursday, 10 September)
• updated WOFF specification (Thursday, 10 September)
• Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals (Friday, 3 July)
• single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• compressed fonts: a proposed format (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)

karsten luecke

• Re: .screenfonts P.S. (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata? (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: Formats and Licensing (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: Formats and Licensing (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)

Laurence Penney

• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• IRC (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Problems with style-linked EOTs (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)

Levantovsky, Vladimir

• RE: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type" (Monday, 31 August)
• RE: Format name proposals (Saturday, 29 August)
• RE: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• RE: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Friday, 7 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• RE: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Tuesday, 4 August)
• EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Saturday, 1 August)
• RE: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)

luke whitmore

• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)

Mark Tomlin

• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 5 August)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: Format name proposals (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Friday, 7 August)
• RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (and possibly v.1.2) (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)

Oliver Rigby

• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)

Patrick Garies

• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Philip Taylor

• Font optimizer tool (Saturday, 1 August)

Ricardo Esteves

• Re: Format name proposals (Sunday, 30 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Wednesday, 26 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Monday, 10 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Saturday, 8 August)

Richard Fink

• RE: EOT usage technique (Monday, 14 September)
• RE: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• RE: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Tuesday, 8 September)
• RE: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type" (Sunday, 30 August)
• RE: Format name proposals (Saturday, 29 August)
• Re: Format name proposals (Thursday, 27 August)
• RE: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Monday, 10 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Saturday, 8 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite testing for IE 6 (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: Use What Is There - (Sunday, 26 July)
• RE: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward - I Propose An Active Adjournment For Assessment (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: A way forward (was: Webfont compression) (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: "Web fonts - where are we?" (Tuesday, 21 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Saturday, 18 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Saturday, 18 July)
• RE: .screenfonts (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: a basic question (Tuesday, 7 July)
• RE: Partial fonts (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)

Richard Rutter

• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages (Wednesday, 9 September)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: A way forward (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: A way forward (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion) (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Sergey Malkin

• RE: CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite) (Tuesday, 28 July)

Simon Daniels

• RE: Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available) (Thursday, 6 August)

Sylvain Galineau

• RE: Format name proposals (Wednesday, 2 September)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal (Wednesday, 26 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code (Monday, 10 August)
• RE: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Friday, 7 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• RE: Supporting EOT-Lite (Saturday, 1 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Saturday, 1 August)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: Another web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite clarification (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• RE: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward) (Saturday, 25 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• RE: Webfont compression (Wednesday, 22 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Monday, 20 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Monday, 10 August)
• Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: New file format names (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: New file format names (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns) (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Supporting EOT-Lite (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Weekend (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: A way forward (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Thursday, 23 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs (Wednesday, 22 July)
• Re: "Web fonts — where are we?" (Monday, 20 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Partial fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Partial fonts (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: a basic question (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• EOT and EOT-based proposals (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)

Tal Leming

• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Sunday, 26 July)
• Re: A way forward (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)

Thomas Lord

• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• apologies and decision table (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: New file format names (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: New file format names (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: New file format names (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• RE: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Sunday, 2 August)
• RE: Supporting EOT-Lite (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1) (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Thursday, 30 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Some history of font sharing (Wednesday, 29 July)
• format changes as false protection (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• RE: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (was: "A way forward") (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: A way forward (Tuesday, 28 July)
• RE: A way forward (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward) (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly) (Saturday, 25 July)
• Re: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• RE: A way forward (Friday, 24 July)
• Formats and Licensing (Re: A way forward) (Friday, 24 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• RE: .webfont Proposal 2 (Thursday, 16 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: Questions re web-fonts (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion) (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• the importance of fonts (silly) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: Web font linking progress summary (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• progress on mutual understanding (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: a basic question (Monday, 6 July)
• a basic question (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Friday, 3 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)
• RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: hope for a way forward (Wednesday, 1 July)

Thomas Phinney

• Re: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type" (Sunday, 30 August)
• Re: [css3-fonts] Comments on @font-face: local(...) (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: Next step? (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: WebOTF Proposal (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1 (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: EOT & DMCA concerns (Tuesday, 4 August)
• EOT & DMCA concerns (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: cutting to the chase (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Saturday, 1 August)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: EOT-Lite File Format (Friday, 31 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: The unmentionable (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: Fonts and security (Thursday, 30 July)
• Re: .screenfonts (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata) (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata (Monday, 27 July)
• Re: Webfont compression (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: "Web fonts — where are we?" (Monday, 20 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Saturday, 18 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes] (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal 2 (Friday, 17 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)
• Re: .webfont Proposal (Sunday, 12 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Partial fonts (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: The other party in all this (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: the discussion is over, resistance time (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION (Wednesday, 1 July)

W3C

• Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months. (Wednesday, 15 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 16 September 2009 14:20:13 UTC