Re: A way forward

2009/7/24 Sylvain Galineau <>:
>> >> That seems like an adequate speedbump; it has acceptable cross
>> linking
>> >> restriction, installation in desktops is refused for such files, and
>> >> foundries can supply different files for desktop and web licenses. I
>> >> think it must be included in any summaries of the various proposals.
>> >
>> > Fine by me.
>> Um, really? saying 'TTF prepared for the web' is
>> a fine web font format seems surprising. Okay!
> I was and still am fine with your last statement i.e. I am OK with including
> it in any summary of the various proposals. I thought that'd go without saying :)

LOL yes, I saw the first sentence, not the 2nd. Sorry for the confusion! :-)

Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:42:52 UTC