- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:01:13 +0000
- To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
- CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Very nice ! I have one outstanding question regarding ZOT compression: what are the concrete benefits of per-table compression ? I'm willing to risk a 'duh' answer here :) That's fine as I have no development experience with low-level font handling. >-----Original Message----- >From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On Behalf >Of Tal Leming >Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:11 PM >To: www-font >Subject: WebOTF Proposal > >We, (Jonathan Kew, Erik van Blokland and myself) have combined our ZOT >and .webfont proposals into a new WebOTF proposal. The full >specification is attached. > >In short: >- The ZOT compression scheme is retained. >- The XML data from the .webfont proposal, in a reduced and refactored >form, is stored within the WebOTF file. > >We are still endorsing the same-origin restrictions and CORS concepts >that have been discussed. We are still hopeful that browsers will find >ways to display the meta data stored in the font. > >We'd love to know what you think. > >Tal
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 21:01:58 UTC