Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format

On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 13:16 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> I am not a lawyer, as I stated before.  However, EOTL does not *allow*
> you to ignore rootstrings, it *requires* you to.

The opposite is apparently the case.

An EOTC file with a non-nil rootstring has a 
version number distinct from EOTLs and apparently
an EOTL processor MUST reject that file.


Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 19:12:08 UTC