- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:32:29 -0400
- To: "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "Thomas Lord" <lord@emf.net>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "John Hudson" <tiro@tiro.com>, "www-font" <www-font@w3.org>
On Friday, July 24, 2009 5:59 PM Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > > But however wrong Hakon's latest shtick may be, it does not follow EOT- > Lite can work in practice. > If, as John pointed out, the font vendors' EULAs do require same-origin > checks then IE can't comply. > Which throws all potential interop benefits out of the window. Now > *this* is an argument against EOT-Lite > I can live with. Provided, of course, we have the evidence to call it. > A simple workaround can fix this - a non-empty root string in EOT-Lite can be ignored by all other browsers but will compensate for the lack of support for same origin restriction in legacy IE implementations. I know this may be unpopular solution, but it is an easy fix so that both browser supporting same-origin restriction and legacy IE implementation will behave the same way. Regards, Vlad
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 22:33:37 UTC