RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

• From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:15:10 +0000
• To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
• CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E021387BD@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

>Which sounds like an unwillingness to endorse
>the intention that conforming UAs are free to
>implement the full EOT.
>
>That is alarming.

First, and for the record, that is not what I said.

Second, as other browser vendors have in fact refuse
to endorse EOT for these very reasons and that in turn
is the reason for creating EOTL, your argument is, again,
a waste of everyone's time. Thank you.

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 19:15:53 UTC