- From: Bill Davis <info@ascenderfonts.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:04:33 -0500
- To: <www-font@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-font@w3.org>
>From: Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net] >Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:45 PM >This thread started because someone from Ascender stated their position >and I made the point I did. My apologies to all for stepping into a pile of doggy doo, and having it smell up so many posts/replies. -:) Even though this thread had quite a few twists & turns, I do want to thank you all for explaining in detail the various issues and the reasoning behind some of the decisions that have been made. The security issues, especially with fonts, need careful consideration. I think that the two examples of rationale for same-origin restrictions which Thomas Lord pointed out (helping to protect the bandwidth of servers offering fonts, and helping to protect users from malicious fonts) do make sense, and I will keep this in mind as we move forward with a web font solution. Bill
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 03:01:22 UTC