Re: New file format names

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Thomas Lord<lord@emf.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 19:59 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> This makes it clear that Hakon's fears revolve essentially around
>> marketing - he fears that if a format named EOT-Lite is standardized,
>
> It's clear in plain english that while
> Håkon has made reference to the *name*
> of EOTL to help explain his point, his
> reserve is not based simply on the name.

So, once again, "If you don't know, I won't tell you.".  I see.

> The mere fact you are going on as if
> his objection were simply about the name
> - and not being corrected by any EOT*
> advocate - helps to illustrate just how
> badly the EOT* effort has failed: how
> disingenuous the whole thing is.

Now I, and the format as a whole, am damned by silence.  It is
apparently impossible that everyone who's been monitoring the list
over the last couple of hours agrees with me.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 01:57:02 UTC