- From: Jason CranfordTeague <jason@brighteyemedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:23:33 -0400
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Cc: <cfynn@gmx.net>, <www-font@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:24:17 UTC
On 2 Jul 2009, at 12:56 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > On Thursday, July 02, 2009 1:47 AM Christopher Fynn wrote: >> >> While font vendors may be pushing for it, in the long run, is a new >> web-only font format going to be any more effective at "protecting" >> fonts than various audio formats have been at "protecting" music? >> > > I am not sure about music in general, but I think that iTunes is a > good > example where the technology, the users and the content providers > strike > a (nearly) perfect balance, which makes everybody happy as a result. > Yes, I regret sometimes not being able to directly transfer the music > files I purchased on iTunes to other devices, but I find this > inconvenience a small price to pay for having a service such as iTunes > provided to me, and for having a great collection of top-rated artists > with wide range of choices available to all users. Bur of course, Apple removed DRM restrictions in iTunes for music a while ago, and you can now transfer newer purchases between as many devices as your heart desires: http://www.macworld.com/article/138000/2009/01/drm_faq.html
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 17:24:17 UTC