RE: EOT-Lite File Format

>From: Levantovsky, Vladimir
>[mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com]


>Actually, I think it makes sense to completely ignore root strings,
>version numbers and all the fields that are irrelevant (defined as
>padding in John Daggett's draft). Browser will do a simple check to see
>if the data encoded in EOT file can be processed or not - if yes, the
>font is loaded.

Yeah, you're right of course. The original proposal still stands and it
ignored rootstrings.

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 02:36:08 UTC