W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:51:00 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E02138628@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 10:15 AM

> Valid EOTLs are a strict subset of valid EOTs.  Can an implementation
> conform to the EOTL spec while still successfully processing those
> files which are valid EOT but not EOTL?  You can qualify your answer
> with any sets of features differing between EOT and EOTL if you wish.

I hope so as that's what the next release of IE must do :)
Version 2 files that match all the EOTL criteria will be treated
as EOTL including same-origin/CORS. Anything that is not a valid EOTL
but a valid EOT will be treated as such.

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 17:51:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:33 UTC