- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:06:55 +0000
- To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- CC: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
>The EOTL proposal says "is not loaded" if the >root string is non-nil. That's a rootstring check. >It is very distinct from ignoring the rootstring, >at least as stated. The proposal is here. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2009JulSep/0780.html There is no rootstring check. The header version proposed in the latest amendment has no rootstring. Last chance.
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 02:07:39 UTC