Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:05 PM, John Hudson<> wrote:
> EOTC fonts should be completely ignored by all browsers except IE. It should
> be obvious that this is actually in the interests of the EOTL format,
> because if EOTC fonts are not interoperable with other browsers, this
> encourages both font makers and authors to use EOTL instead. If, on the
> other hand, non-IE browsers treat EOTC fonts as if they are EOTL, then such
> fonts will stick around much longer, just waiting for someone to sue the
> browser maker or the W3C for circumventing the rootstring mechanism in EOTC.

I agree. If I were an open source and free software advocate, I would
have zero interest in having my browser support EOTC. Not supporting
EOTC would be a cleaner break and put some pressure on those few web
sites using EOTC to move to EOTL.

I'm going to comment on the DMCA stuff in another message.



Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 23:00:46 UTC