- From: Richard Fink <rfink@readableweb.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:55:40 -0400
- To: "'Tal Leming'" <tal@typesupply.com>, "'www-font'" <www-font@w3.org>
Looks like the best of both approaches to me. I echo Thomas Phinney's endorsement. Definitely the right track. Awesome indeed. Regards, Rich -----Original Message----- From: www-font-request@w3.org [mailto:www-font-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tal Leming Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:11 PM To: www-font Subject: WebOTF Proposal We, (Jonathan Kew, Erik van Blokland and myself) have combined our ZOT and .webfont proposals into a new WebOTF proposal. The full specification is attached. In short: - The ZOT compression scheme is retained. - The XML data from the .webfont proposal, in a reduced and refactored form, is stored within the WebOTF file. We are still endorsing the same-origin restrictions and CORS concepts that have been discussed. We are still hopeful that browsers will find ways to display the meta data stored in the font. We'd love to know what you think. Tal
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 20:56:19 UTC