- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:55:10 -0700
- CC: www-font@w3.org
Dave Crossland wrote: > 2009/7/24 karsten luecke <list@kltf.de>: >> next you will tell me that Typotheque is developing its web font >> service because they are so happy with raw TTF/OTF @font-face linking ... > Stands to reason that they are DEMONSTRABLY happy with raw TTF/OTF > @font-face linking, or they wouldn't develop the service that uses it, > no? Hey, this koolaid tastes funny! Sorry, Dave: it doesn't need to 'stand to reason', because some of us actually know what Peter's motivation was in developing this hack. It is an attempt at a workaround, trying to disguise the nakedness of the font by disfiguring its private parts. It is a reaction *against* naked font linking, not a vote in its favour. Typotheque supports the .webfont proposal. John Hudson
Received on Saturday, 25 July 2009 00:55:51 UTC