- From: ACJ <ego@acjs.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:15:03 +0200
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: W3C Font WG <www-font@w3.org>
François REMY schreef: > > And if I use width: 100% and then having padding due to another > style rule that I was not aware of ? > > Would I not get better result in IE 6 ? On other browsers, the padding > would make the page disformed, while IE 6 will do what I expected. > This is not because I've better result that it's the good > implementation... > > And it's not because I get better result with a bad implementation that > no one should implement the "good" behavior. François, It's rather OT, but isn't that what max-width is for? It's a label that describes what it does, has been around for a long time, and is -- somewhat ironically -- not supported by the IE 6 you mention. Greetings, ACJ
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 10:15:51 UTC