W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!]

From: ACJ <ego@acjs.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:15:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4A4DDA27.1040803@acjs.net>
To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Cc: W3C Font WG <www-font@w3.org>
François REMY schreef:
> And if I use width: 100% and then having padding due to another
> style rule that I was not aware of ?
> Would I not get better result in IE 6 ? On other browsers, the padding
> would make the page disformed, while IE 6 will do what I expected.
> This is not because I've better result that it's the good 
> implementation...
> And it's not because I get better result with a bad implementation that
> no one should implement the "good" behavior.

It's rather OT, but isn't that what max-width is for? It's a label that 
describes what it does, has been around for a long time, and is -- 
somewhat ironically -- not supported by the IE 6 you mention.


Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 10:15:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:32 UTC