- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:06:28 -0400
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Cc: Laurence Penney <lorp@lorp.org>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Phinney<tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu> wrote: > IMO, the main benefit of MTX is not that it is much more compressed > than anything else (as you say, it isn't), but that it is the only > in-font compression scheme that is compatible with the existing > installed base of IE. Does IE not support gzip for EOT files, or is there some disadvantage to HTTP-level (not in-font) compression that I'm missing? The disk space should be negligible, bandwidth is the only concern I can see.
Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 17:07:08 UTC