Re: Webfont compression

Christopher Fynn wrote:
> Isn't this discussion only going on because MS and font
> vendors insist on something different or more complicated?

Because of type designers.
And it is about "different" rather than "more complicated" since there is no complication. Quoting John Daggett:

> Any of the solutions that have been proposed (webfont,
> EOT-Lite, ZOT) are relatively easy to implement, assuming
>  no DRMish features are involved.


Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 11:39:10 UTC