- From: karsten luecke <list@kltf.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:36:18 +0200 (MEST)
- To: www-font@w3.org
Christopher Fynn wrote: > Isn't this discussion only going on because MS and font > vendors insist on something different or more complicated? Because of type designers. And it is about "different" rather than "more complicated" since there is no complication. Quoting John Daggett: > Any of the solutions that have been proposed (webfont, > EOT-Lite, ZOT) are relatively easy to implement, assuming > no DRMish features are involved. Karsten
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 11:39:10 UTC