- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:21:17 +1200
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: www-font@w3.org
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 22:21:52 UTC
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > The idea that there should be multiple formats to reflect the difference in > IP or licensing status -- i.e. naked fonts for free fonts and some > different, probably wrapper format for non-free fonts -- strikes me as daft. > The idea that creators and users of free fonts should be forced to jump through hoops to "protect the IP" of third parties they have no connection with strikes *me* as daft. If you accept that, and you also believe that some sort of obfuscation is necessary for non-free fonts, then I think it makes total sense to want multiple formats. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 22:21:52 UTC