- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
> PS. If someone does want to start a Typophile thread on this topic, I'll > be happy to explain why the OT 'size' feature is a lousy hack that > breaks the OT layout model, is unlikely ever to be implemented in much > software, and why a more robust and sensible approach is needed. :) Done. http://typophile.com/node/60432 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Hudson" <tiro@tiro.com> To: "www-font" <www-font@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:01:53 AM GMT -10:00 Hawaii Subject: Re: .screenfonts Fascinating as this discussion is, I think it probably belongs over on Typophile, where it can contribute to general discussions about screenfonts without distracting from the question of web font format. At the risk of annoying Laurence, I'd say that the topic of size-specific screenfonts is orthogonal to that of web font format. JH PS. If someone does want to start a Typophile thread on this topic, I'll be happy to explain why the OT 'size' feature is a lousy hack that breaks the OT layout model, is unlikely ever to be implemented in much software, and why a more robust and sensible approach is needed. :)
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 15:11:30 UTC