- From: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:54:14 -0400
- To: Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Aug 7, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Slye wrote: > I am actually not so excited about "WebOTF" as a name. Was it > necessary to toss out "webfont"? Two syllables is better than four. :) We thought that it would be better to reference the format that it wraps. This way if another font format needs to be wrapped, we have something to follow. WebPhotoFont, WebUFO, etc. Tal
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 19:54:53 UTC