- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:54:37 -0400
- To: "Christopher Fynn" <cfynn@gmx.net>, <www-font@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 02, 2009 2:16 PM Christopher Fynn wrote: > > Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > > ... > > > However, by making raw TTF/OTF fonts available on > > the web for unrestricted access, we create an environment where fonts > > are easily accessible, can be copied any time by anyone for any use > > outside web - this is what font vendors are most concerned about. I > > think that a simple solution such as what was outlined by Tab Atkins > > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2009JulSep/0000.html) > will > > be sufficient, effective and, at the same, useful for authors and web > > users. > > So you're content with a (? font specific) compression wrapping > otherwise unaltered TTF/OTF fonts? Is that sufficient for Microsoft > too? > Yes, I believe that an efficient font-specific compression technology plus some sort of access control mechanism is what I can live with. I cannot speak for Microsoft though. Regards, Vladimir > - C > >
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 18:55:14 UTC