On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>wrote: > Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > >Not so. I've indicated willingness to find a compromise: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0412.html > > Your "compromise" still includes the one "feature" that we (and font > vendors) have said isn't acceptable - direct TTF/OTF linking. > I don't think anyone who's already implemented support for direct TTF/OTF linking would consider dropping support for it. I didn't think dropping that support was a precondition for font vendors buying into Ascender's New-Web-Fonts-Proposal. If it is, then I think no compromise is possible. Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2009 22:44:50 UTC