- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:08:14 -0700
- CC: www-font@w3.org
Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > I don't think "EOT Lite" is such a good idea. I don't *any* standard > should have the word "lite" in it: No argument from me about that. One of the first responses to Ascender's EOT Lite proposal from many of my colleagues was 'We've got to call it something better than that!'. Not only does 'Lite' suggest a relationship to EOT that is clearly confusing even to the people on this list, its kinda tacky and suggests beer that doesn't taste of anything. JH
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 22:08:57 UTC