W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Next step?

From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:18:40 -0700
To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
Cc: www-font@w3.org
Message-Id: <1250097520.6312.25.camel@dell-desktop.example.com>
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:34 -0700, Thomas Phinney wrote:

> Yes, I know that some folks want naked font support to be a MUST. But
> given that MS won't accept that,

Please keep an open mind and give them the
benefit of the doubt that as the problem 
space has become and continues to become 
better understood, they might change their

Conversely, they might come up with something
that hasn't been seen: a compelling rationale
for why TTF/OTF should NOT be a MUST.

The awkward outcome is if they both fail to
change their mind and fail to come up with
a compelling rationale.   Hopefully all parties
agree to try to avoid that awkward outcome.

Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 17:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:33 UTC