RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 from Sylvain Galineau on 2009-07-31 (www-font@w3.org from July to September 2009)

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:32:54 +0000
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E02138972@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

> From: Levantovsky, Vladimir
> [mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com]


> Unless we reach a consensus for MTX to become part of EOT-Lite, and
> then
> patented technology is licensed on unrestricted RF terms and is no
> longer an issue, as is the case with any other W3C Recommendation.

Until such a consensus exists and the proposal is edited to reflect it,
An EOTL implementation conforming to the latest proposal will not
infringe on Monotype's MTX compression IP. Agreed ?

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 20:33:38 UTC