- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:09:00 +0000
- To: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- CC: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net] >On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 00:44 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net] > >> >Because "more fonts" in your sense is a transient >> >concern and in this case it comes at high expense >> >to users. It is the opposite of what a reputable >> >standards party should do. >> The expense is already high today, so you should demonstrate how the >proposed solution inflates today's costs. > >I think that I have, with your help. Right. Everyone else's proposal requires changes to existing software and that constitutes unacceptable bloat. Your solution requires changes to the exact same software but that's good because you state that is so. Try again.
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 01:09:42 UTC