- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:31:11 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 22:24 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > >If a W3C Recommendation provides at least two > >font formats which UAs are required to support, > >TTF/OTF and "something else", what objection have you? > That rationale has been explained and argued already You might provide a link (because I dispute your claim that it has been explained) but, regardless, at this point the question is for others to decide. My take away as things stand is that Microsoft declines to clearly state a rationale in this area, leaving the rest of us to speculate, certain only about Microsoft's refusal. -t
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 22:31:52 UTC