- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:20:34 -0700
- To: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
These conclusions from the discussion seem correct to me: 1) Consensus on a wrapper format is not forthcoming anytime soon. Implementation experience with wrapper formats in UAs is missing and not expected in any serious form anytime soon. 2) Consensus on EOT-classic (with or without rootstring enforcement, MTX, and so forth) is unlikely to ever be reached. 3) Consensus on EOTL variants is unlikely to ever be reached. 4) Rough consensus on TTF/OTF exists and plenty of working code exists. If this were to appear as a requirement in a draft Recommendation, formal Objections would likely be raised by some font vendors and/or Microsoft. It is unlikely that these Objections could be resolved by the WG and thus they would be taken up by the Director in consultation with the AB and TAG. 5) Rough consensus on same-origin+CORS restrictions on font linking is achievable. The sanctification of a Recommendation that requires TTF/OTF, most likely with same-origin+CORS, would encourage the use of fonts on the web. It would contribute to the breadth and depth of conforming web content. It would likely stimulate the development and release of fonts for web use. Such sanctification risks creating a schism in which Microsoft refuses to ever conform. Perhaps such a schism harms W3C's overall efforts or perhaps not. Withholding such sanctification risks creating a schism in which Microsoft plays an unduly dominant role in determining the content of Recommendations. The formal Objection process, in which the Director hears the claims of those not agreeing to the consensus view, exists to address such difficult situations. Therefore: A font WG should be formed. It should draft a Recommendation requiring TTF/OTF support. It should consider whether or not to require same-origin+CORS restrictions on font linking. It should forward the resulting draft Recommendation to the Director, along with such unresolved formal Objections as Microsoft and some font vendors may wish to register. -t
Received on Monday, 3 August 2009 00:21:15 UTC