- From: Christopher Fynn <cfynn@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:02:37 +0600
- To: www-font@w3.org
- CC: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Unless you resort to something like a proprietary font format requiring a special browser plug-in to run and proprietary tools to generate nothing is going to provide a significant obstacle (more than a "garden-fence") to tampering or extracting font data. If some web-font format becomes widespread or mandatory you can sure it won't be long before someone creates a web-font to ttf/otf converter. Someone else might then re-convert them back to web-fonts and so-on. Trouble is such re-generated fonts may then be different enough from the fonts they ultimately derive from, that they become harder to discover and prove they are copies - or who copied what from whom. - Chris Thomas Phinney wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:25 PM, John Hudson<tiro@tiro.com> wrote: >> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >>> For example, you could add in the font name, purchaser's name, and a >>> unique serial number identifying the sale. To prevent tampering, sign >>> all of it with your private key. Anyone can then verify the >>> information with your public key (which you can even put into the font >>> metadata next to all the other data), but they can't change it short >>> of breaking the basis of all modern cryptography (and then you've got >>> a lot more to worry about than people infringing on your copyright). >> Some vendors are already adding such information to fonts, automatically at >> point of sale, and digitally signing the fonts. This is currently being done >> in private font tables, but a standard table might also be defined. There >> has also been some talk of methods for watermarking fonts à la images. > > Although this is fine as far as it goes, it does NOT "prevent > tampering." Remember, the font is not encrypted, just signed. Somebody > deletes the signature and the custom data, and it's untraceable which > customer the font came from. > > That doesn't mean it's not worth doing. It's another post in the > garden fence, is all. > > Cheers, > > T
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 06:03:31 UTC