- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:26:48 +0000
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "rfink@readableweb.com" <rfink@readableweb.com>
- CC: 'Dave Crossland' <dave@lab6.com>, 'Thomas Phinney' <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, 'www-font' <www-font@w3.org>
>Using WEFT, authors had to scan their HTML pages to create EOT files. >This was highly inconvenient and proably the major reason why nobody >used it. You're saying that the solutions in development will be even >more inconvenient? This is, to my knowledge, untrue. You would do that if you wanted to generate an EOT file that was subsetted for a static page. There is no need to do this if all you want to do is set up a font file for your whole site.
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 00:27:56 UTC