- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:22:32 -0700
- To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 00:16 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net] wrote: > >On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 23:56 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> Not sure why that would be the case. If it enables more fonts to be licensed for web use, then why would they object? > > > >Because "more fonts" in your sense is a transient > >concern and in this case it comes at high expense > >to users. It is the opposite of what a reputable > >standards party should do. > > I don't know why you think licensing is a "transient concern." Sir, are you an honest debater? If so, why do you equivocate my "'more fonts'" with your "licensing"? Have you failed to notice what prominance I have given to licensing in my wrapper proposal, or are you deliberately obfuscating at this point? Sincerely, -t
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 00:23:14 UTC