W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback

From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:22:32 -0700
To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1246580552.6767.181.camel@dell-desktop.example.com>
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 00:16 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Thomas Lord [mailto:lord@emf.net] wrote:
> >On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 23:56 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> Not sure why that would be the case.  If it enables more fonts to be licensed for web use, then why would they object?
> >
> >Because "more fonts" in your sense is a transient
> >concern and in this case it comes at high expense
> >to users.  It is the opposite of what a reputable
> >standards party should do.
> I don't know why you think licensing is a "transient concern."

Sir, are you an honest debater?

If so, why do you equivocate my "'more fonts'"
with your "licensing"?

Have you failed to notice what prominance
I have given to licensing in my wrapper 
proposal, or are you deliberately obfuscating
at this point?

Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 00:23:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:32 UTC