Re: WebOTF Proposal

On Aug 7, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Laurence Penney wrote:

> 2. Add an 'id' attribute or element in the <license> element. Of  
> course this can be encoded in the private data, but openly  
> identifying the contract under which the font is published seems  
> desirable for commercially licensed fonts - just as the Ordnance  
> Survey requires licensees to note their license number on each map  
> publication.

This is a good idea.

> 4. Replace the Private Data block with an optional <private> element  
> in the metadata, which might contain regular text or base-64 encoded  
> blobs (zipped, it won't take up any more space than the existing  
> proposal).

Do you have a reason why you want it in the XML instead of a separate  


Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 17:48:12 UTC