Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Lord<> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:12 +0200, Fran├žois REMY wrote:
>> False. EOTC has been proposed as standard by Microsoft and all
>> technologies related to him (MTX...) are beeing opened by Microsoft
>> and Monotype Imaging. Any browser could implement EOTC.
>> The problem is that no browser *want* to do so.
> None of the other browser makers want to implement
> the protection features of that proposal.  If
> people who currently have restricted license fonts
> in the wild in EOT were to assert that other browsers
> should go ahead and implement EOT but without any
> kind of enforcement, some other browser implementers
> would likely still object but the case in favor would
> at least be a lot stronger.

Do you have any reason to believe that authors in the wild would ask
for that?  Or is this just part of your charming hypothetical?


Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 19:27:18 UTC