RE: EOT-Lite File Format

On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 03:01 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> 

> It has been repeatedly stated that the latest proposal is to limit
> EOTL to a header version (2.0) that contains no rootstrings.

What is to be required of a UA encountering a file
which can be processed in the manner of EOTL but 
for the fact it contains a root string?  You seem
to say that you expect conforming UAs to not render.


-t

Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 03:40:18 UTC