- From: Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:39:40 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 03:01 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > It has been repeatedly stated that the latest proposal is to limit > EOTL to a header version (2.0) that contains no rootstrings. What is to be required of a UA encountering a file which can be processed in the manner of EOTL but for the fact it contains a root string? You seem to say that you expect conforming UAs to not render. -t
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 03:40:18 UTC