- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:11:03 +0200
- To: "Dave Crossland" <dave@lab6.com>, <www-font@w3.org>
To me, you're showing a bad graphic. And you know that during hollydays, the number of people beeing at work is going down, so it fairly good explain why IE have lost some 2%. The revelant graph is here, and IE is not loosing so much as you would like to say : http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-200807-200907 Whether you want or not, IE is not in a 'terminal decline'. IE6, maybe. IE7, slowly, but IE8 is slowly gaining what IE7 have lost. It's normal. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dave Crossland" <dave@lab6.com> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:58 PM To: <www-font@w3.org> Subject: Re: A way forward > 2009/7/23 Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>: >> 2009/7/23 John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>: >>> >>> It certainly seems to me in Mozilla's interest to shift their support to >>> something like .webfont as the interoperable standard: it is easy to >>> implement, it may avoid a fight that they are likely to lose, and it >>> doesn't >>> give Microsoft any advantage. >> >> I would put money on MS losing the fight, actually; their market share >> is in terminal decline. > > Forgot the reference, sorry: > > http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/05/since-march-internet-explorer-lost-114-percent-share-to-firefox-safari-and-chrome/ >
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 17:11:44 UTC