ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013 by subject

#1: Upgrade Mechanism

#1: Upgrade proposals [was: Call for Proposals re: #314]

#255 eviction for substitution

#305 Header ordering

#501, was: Does idempotence include the response codes?

#504 does From: allow non addr-spec mailbox values?

#506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

#507 integer value parsing, Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

#516 note about WWW-A parsing potentially misleading

#520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

#522, was: Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25

#527, Question for the editors about draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25

#528, Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf

#540 clarify ABNF layering

#541, use of "word" ABNF production

2014 Meeting planning

2817 for TLS (was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09)

6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States)

8.1.2 Examples (Re: 6.6 PUSH_PROMISE (Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States))

[apps-discuss] content inspection in absence of media type, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

[apps-discuss] FYI: LINK and UNLINK

[apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation

[Gen-art] #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

[Gen-art] [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25

[Gen-art] spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

[httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

[IAB] Mandatory encryption as part of HTTP2

[perpass] Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

[secdir] additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

[secdir] RFC2119 vs "ought" etc, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

[tsvwg] The List (of application-layer desired features)

A proposal

additional mechanisms on top of the auth framework, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

All changes but huffman encoding integrated + a question

Ambiguity when handling DATA frames on closed streams

Announcing DNSNMC - fixes the HTTPS authentication problem using Namecoin

Any HTTP/2.0 browser/server available for test

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-24

APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

authenticated unencrypted

Cacheable response codes

Cacheable status codes

Call for Proposals re: #314 HTTP2 and http:// URIs on the "open" internet

Commnets on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00 was RE: perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

CONNECT and HTTP/2.0

connection limits, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

content inspection in absence of media type, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

Cookie crumbling

Cookie crumbling in -09

custom byte ranges, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

Default stream priority

deprecation of HTTP header field line folding, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

disabling header compression

Does HTTP/2.0 client connection header include SETTINGS frame?

Does idempotence include the response codes?

Draft-08 and Third Implementation Draft Milestones

draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08 / 5.1. Stream States

draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations - missing Secure method

draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24, "4.3.4 PUT"

draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-02.txt

Expect/Continue and Removing 1xx Final Status codes from HTTP/2

Explicit Proxy [was: A proposal]

Explicit proxy options and defaults

First cut of Huffman encoding in compression document.

Focusing our discussion on issues

Frame Type 8

Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

Fwd: [httpbis] #524: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25

Fwd: [httpbis] #525: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25

Fwd: A proposal

Fwd: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25

Fwd: IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-00.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-01.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-01.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-ext-frames-01.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-02.txt

Fwd: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

FYI: DRAFT agenda for Vancouver is out

FYI: LINK and UNLINK

FYI: Using ALPN protocol IDs in Web Perf specs

Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25

Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14

Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25

Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion

Heads up for January F2F

How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security

HPACK benchmark test for substitution indexing vs incremental indexing only

HPACK encoder/decoder memory bounding

HPACK examples.

HPACK performance summary

HPACK Security : Academic Paper

Http 2

HTTP 2.0 mandatory security vs. Amateur Radio

HTTP response cacheability and query components

HTTP/2 extensions and proxies

HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS

HTTP/2.0 protocol identifier string (#323)

httpbis -24 drafts

httpbis -25 drafts, Re: httpbis -24 drafts

HTTPBIS WG Interim Meeting, 22-24 January 2014

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/329 - Flow control window overflow

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Advice

I ran across this while working on the spec.

I revised the pro/contra document

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-09.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-04.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-05.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-07.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-08.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25.txt

I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-25.txt

IAB statement on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-00

IANA issues, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

IANA URIS, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

idea -- MAX_PUSH_RESOURCE_SIZE

If anyone's in vancouver

implementation of HTTP 2.0 Upgrade in node-http2

Integer Representation in header-compression-draft-03

Is more than 7bits EOS padding or full EOS sequence in huffman byte string subject to compression error?

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-08.txt> (Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Authentication Scheme Registrations) to Informational RFC

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-13.txt> (Initial Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Method Registrations) to Informational RFC

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing) to Proposed Standard

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content) to Proposed Standard

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests) to Proposed Standard

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests) to Proposed Standard

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching) to Proposed Standard

Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication) to Proposed Standard

last example on 8.1.1 is faulty?

Mandatory TLS == OpenSSL everywhere? !?!

Minutes from last week's interim meeting?

MLS or TLS? There is more than one encryption option.

Mobile headers

Moving forward on improving HTTP's security

multipart 206 responses in HTTP/2.0

New draft-loreto-httpbis-proxy20-00.txt

New Version Notification for draft-bishop-http2-extension-frames-00.txt

New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-00.txt

New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt

New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt

New Version Notification for draft-snell-httpbis-keynego-01.txt

Next pre-draft implementation in javascript.

Non-browser uses (was Re: disabling header compression)

non-tls http2 client has to send settings twice?

obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24

obs-date, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review, etc.

on the long-term viability of http/1.1 as a fall-back option

on/about a stream, frame ordering

Our ALPN protocol IDs

p6: maximum delta-seconds of 2147483648

per stream (initial) flow window size

perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01

Pervasive encryption: Pro and contra

Preliminary minutes from the Seattle Interim

Proposal for doing unauthenticated encryption inside of HTTP/2

Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal

proxies and forwarding of credentials, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

Proxy User Stories

push_promise sent after frames that reference promised resources

question about :authority header field

Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation

Question for the editors about draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-25

Question on flow control for a single file transfer

Questions about ALPN

Reasonable proposal for migrating to 2.0

Redundant rule? quoted-str-nf

Registration requirements for transfer codings, was: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-24

relax SHOULD send Last-Modified?, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-24

Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation

Restarting the discussion on HTTP/2 stream priorities

Reuse of credentials per realm, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

RFC1918 + localhost

RFC2119 vs "ought" etc, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

Rough agenda for Vancouver

Rough minutes

SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

Security concern about open range integers (was: Question about: 4.1.1 Integer representation)

SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE and ACK

should tools like wget implement HTTP 2.0?

Some entropy calculations with secret/huffman interaction

Some HTTP 2.0 questions

something I don't get about the current plan...

Sorry

spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

Starting HTTP/2.0 for HTTP - Upgrade

Strawman for DoS considerations

Suggestion for simplified HTTP 2.0 header compression algorithm

That wonderful 1980-ies hippie vibe...

Things we know and can hopefully agree upon w.r.t. the state of the web today.

Third Implementation Draft [was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-09.txt]

Three More Proxy User Stories

TLS at transport level vs stream multiplexing and aggregation (http "routers")

TLS WG discussion of ALPN

Trailer bug

Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document)

Uppercase/lowercase header field names

What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies?

WWW-Authenticate parsing quirks, was: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-24

Yet another trusted proxy suggestion

Zurich Agenda - adjustment?

Zurich Interim duration

Last message date: Saturday, 28 December 2013 14:36:32 UTC