- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:04:16 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 25 November 2013 16:55, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the GOALS section from: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vidya-httpbis-explicit-proxy-ps-00. > I do think breaking down the conversation in this way is interesting. I just wanted to highlight the one piece: who gets to negotiate this end-state, whatever that end state is. (That's why the paste-dump is somewhat distracting; there's a lot there that isn't particularly well-motivated yet in my opinion and a lot that is not relevant to the immediate discussion.) I think that your first three points or so mean that you think that there are three parties involved in this negotiation: user, intermediary and server. You use the word "user" instead of client, which is telling, and probably a conscious choice. I want to work out whether this is in fact true, in the sense that the user is making an informed, empowered choice. I haven't been given information so far that would allow me to say that this is a) an agreed requirement (in the consensus sense), and b) possible.
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 01:04:44 UTC