W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: A proposal

From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:38:21 +0000
To: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <em9a30d72f-1f21-4792-aba0-7d15c8e6b79e@bodybag>
also, would DANE spell the end of any URI where the authority is given 
as an IP address rather than a domain name?

that's a lot of links to break.

------ Original Message ------
From: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 20/11/2013 12:19:46 p.m.
Subject: Re: A proposal
>On 2013-11-20 11:15, Adrien de Croy wrote:
>>even if a cert is $0 it is not zero cost.
>>Time and effort are not free.
>>All these options involve an ongoing management/maintenance cost as 
>>And are we really proposing the internet should be built on certs from
>>free cert providers? How will they stay in business or the certs
>>remain free once the demand for free certs is multiplied by several
>>orders of magnitude?
>* generate your own CA certificate.
>* have your DNS provider sign it as part of your DNSSEC signed zone 
>* profit
>Payment (of lack of it) will be part of your contractual agreement with 
>DNS provider and avoids the CA authority mess currently blighting trust 
>in TLS.
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 00:38:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:20 UTC