Re: #305 Header ordering

On 26 November 2013 08:40, RUELLAN Herve <> wrote:
> For HPACK, this means that we need to remove the ordering requirements for emission. Add we should probably add that header values should not be split at the compaction layer.

I didn't realize that you did have ordering requirements on emission.
I wouldn't have thought that you would change any of the text around
emission, though you might say - as a more general statement - that
headers can be emitted in any order.

BTW, I think that Section 3.1.5 should be moved under Section 3.2.
Section 3.1 is about the encoder, but 3.1.5 is about the decoder.

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 17:36:50 UTC