Re: How HTTP 2.0 mandatory security will actually reduce my personal security

On 2013-11-15 09:00, Roberto Peon wrote:
> There is explicitly an option for unencrypted HTTP/2, but not over the
> "open" internet, since that is known/provent to be unreliable.
> And in my personal opinion, HTTP is a poor mechanism for cached content:
> it allows for a very limited distribution model and (amongst other
> things) doesn't adequately differentiate between resources that should
> be public, but verifiably unmodified, and private resources.
 > ...


Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 08:40:29 UTC