- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:07:30 -0800
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4 December 2013 13:49, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > What's the goal here? To make the default be low, but not the lowest > priority? As was requested, it was to set the priority default in the middle, so that only exceptional prioritization needs - in both directions - would require an explicit priority. It sounds reasonable on face value at least.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 23:07:57 UTC