- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:40:46 +0100
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
On 2013-11-14 18:49, Roberto Peon wrote: > There is a means of opting out, however, which exists and is widely > deployed: http1 And the WG has a mandate to develop a replacement for 1.1, called 2.0. If we do not indent to develop that protocol anymore, we should re-charter. > There was near unanimity at the plenary that we should do something > about pervasive monitoring, and while I don't believe that there were > any actuonable , unambiguous dieectuves , the spirit of the room was > quite clear. The IETF intends to attempt to do something about this. Yes. What we disagree on what that means for HTTP: URIs. > ... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:41:26 UTC