Re: I revised the pro/contra document

On 24 November 2013 11:12, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com> wrote:

>
>  (that can still use HTTP/1.1 if they want to!)
>
>
I have to chime in here.  I keep seeing this point mentioned on the list.
 This is not a valid counterpoint, or a justification for adding something
to HTTP/2, or an excuse for ignoring someone's use-case for HTTP.  If
anybody chooses HTTP/1.1 over HTTP/2 for _any reason_ other than laziness
or stubborn change aversion, then HTTP/2 has failed in its primary purpose.

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/